The People's Republic: How they came
gal traffic till 31 March 1808, when the British Act of Parliament abolishing it, and forbidding every British citizen from engaging in it, came into force. But illicit traffic in slaves continued til

gal traffic till 31 March 1808, when the British Act of Parliament abolishing it, and forbidding every British citizen from engaging in it, came into force. But illicit traffic in slaves continued till much later. The reason for this was that though the slave-trade was abolished in 1808, slavery remained legal in British overseas possessions until 1833, when this too was abolished.
The abolition of slavery involved Great Britain in enormous
expenditure. She paid the sum of £20m, as compensation to Brit-
ish slave owners for the emancipation of their slaves. The sum of
£400,000 was paid to Spain for the right to search her ships for
slaves. In addition to cancelling a debt of £600,000, she paid Por-
tugal £300,000 for similar rights north of the equator. In spite of
all this, illicit trading in slaves lingered on in different parts of
8
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
HOW THEY CAME
9
Nigeria till about the end of 1850.
As we have noted, the British merchants dealt not only in slaves
but also in commodities like ivory, pepper, and palm oil. The trade
in the more regular articles of commerce grew step by step with
the slave-trade and outlasted it. After almost 300 years of contact,
the British merchants were left in no doubt as to the rich economic
potential of the territory, some of whose resources they had been
tapping along the coast of the Bights of Benin and Biafra. But the
interior of the territory remained a closed book, and its vast wealth
unexplored and unexploited.
In contemplating the exploration and exploitation of the
country's interior, the first problem that had to be solved was that
of communication. Suitable roads were non-existent. In any case,
for British adventurers who had to do about 4,000 miles of sea
voyage before reaching our shores, the safest and most welcome
routes for penetrating the hinterland would be navigable rivers.
The existence of the River Niger had been known to the West-
ern world for centuries; but its actual course remained a mystery.
With a growing awareness of the economic potentialities of Nige-
ria, British businessmen were determined to solve this mystery.
Accordingly, a body known as the African Association was formed
in Britain in 1788, with the object generally of exploring Africa,
and more particularly of discovering the course of the Niger.
The first person who offered his services to the African Asso-
ciation was John Ledyard. He had planned to discover the Niger
via Egypt. But he died in Cairo. Two other unsuccessful attempts
were made by Lucas and Houghton, both under the auspices of the
Association, in 1789 and 1791 respectively. It was four years after
the failure of the third attempt that another offer was forthcoming.
This time, it was from a young and intrepid Scottish doctor, by
name Mungo Park. His expedition was successful; and, because
of that success, he became famous and immortal. On 20 July 1796,
he discovered the Niger, which he exultantly and with poetical
afflatus described as 'the long sought for, majestic Niger, glitter-
ing to (he morning sun, as broad as the Thames at Westminster,
and flowing slowly eastward.'
Mungo Park returned home to Britain in December 1797, hav-
ing solved the mystery surrounding the direction of the Niger, but
not that surrounding its exact course and termination. There was a
legend that the Niger flowed into an inland lake or swamp. In fact,
an authoritative opinion was expressed as late as 1829 that the
Niger, 'after losing itself underground in the deserts beyond Lake
Chad, eventually debouched through marsh and quicksand into
the waters of the Mediterranean.'
Nothing, however, happened until 1805 when another expedi-
tion, under the auspices ofthe British Government and commanded
by Mungo Park, was sent out to discover the actual course and
termination of the Niger. From this expedition, Park never returned.
He, together with his four surviving and ailing white companions
and three Africa slaves, perished in 1806 near Bussa, north of Jebba,
on the self-same 'majestic Niger.'
After Mungo Park's death, various other expeditions - some
of them commanded by names well known to educated Nigerians,
like Denham, Clapperton, and Richard and John Lander - were
launched with a view to completing the task which Mungo Park
had so well begun. Final victory came in 1830 when the Landers
discovered that the 'lordly Niger' emptied itself, through unnum-
bered channels, into the Atlantic Ocean.
Thus the mystery of a great African river was solved; and in the
wake of that solution, a new era oflegitimate commerce, economic
exploitation, political subjugation, and cultural transformation
dawned on Nigeria.
Soon after the Landers had made their discovery known, McGregor
Laird -another name well known to Nigerians - proceeded to form
a company with the object oftrading on the Niger. He was a Liverpool
merchant, and by 1832 two steamers under his leadership had entered
the creeks of the Niger Delta. It was the first time that any ocean-
going craft did so. This first venture was, however, more an explora-
tion of parts of Nigeria's hinterland than a trading expedition. Laird
was only able to get as far as Lokoja. He lost eighteen of his men in
t~e process, and he himself became seriously ill.
To the British merchants and adventurers wanting to do direct
business with the hinterland of Nigeria, the problem was no longer
lack of means of access to the market. They were now harassed and
nonplussed by a fell disease -later identified as malaria - which
constantly took a heavy toll of any group of Europeans who dared
to venture beyond the Bights. However, nothing daunted, the Brit-
ish merchants perservered, and by 1860 they had established trad-
ing stations along the banks of the Niger. It is apposite to mention
that the British mercantile occupation of Nigeria at this time was
very much facilitated by the discovery in 1854 of quinnine, which
was used both as prophylactic and cure for malaria.
By 1870, there were also French merchants trading side by side
with the British on the Niger. In order to eliminate competition
among themselves and so increase their profits, and to present a
common front to their French rivals, the British firms amalgam-
ated in 1879 under the name of the United African Company. This
was changed first (in 1881) to the National African Company Lim-
ited, and later (in 1886) to the Royal Niger Company Chartered
and Limited. It was in the latter name that the amalgamated Brit-
ish firms obtained a Royal Charter dated 10 July 1886.
It must be noted that the Charter did not confer on the Royal
Niger Company monopoly of trade on the banks of the Niger, or in
any other part of Nigeria. Indeed, the Charter specifically stipulated
that' ... Nothing in this our Charter shall be deemed to authorize the
Company to set up or grant any monopoly of trade .... 'Consequently,
various other British firms were free to, and did in fact, trade side
by side with the Royal Niger Company. Under the Charter, how-
ever, the Company was made exclusively responsible for the peace
and orderly government of the entire Niger basin together with the
whole of what is now known as the Northern Provinces of Nigeria.
In other words, like the famous East India Company, the Royal
Niger Company was both a trading and a governing concern. It was
believed that it discharged its incongruous responsibilities fairly well.
It did lucrative business, and governed without excessive partiality.
It organized an armed constabulary with British officers in charge.
It instituted Courts of Justice, and appointed Sir James Marshall as
Chief Justice. It imposed customs duties and trade licences on in-
digenous and other foreign traders desiring to trade within its juris-
diction. These imposts were levied with the stated object of raising
revenue for civil and military administration, but they were not in-
10
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
HOW THEY CAME II
frequently used as a monopoly weapon by means of which rival
firms were completely excluded from buying and selling in the ar- .
eas under the Company's jurisdiction. In this connection, it must be
pointed out that though the Company's jurisdiction legally covered
the Niger basin and the whole of the Northern Region of Nigeria,
yet in practice its effective influence did not extend much beyond
the banks of the Niger, the Benue, and the rivers in the immediate
neighbourhood of its trading stations.
We have already seen that before the discovery of the Niger and
of the access to it from the sea, British merchants had been trading
along the coast of the Bights of Benin and Biafra. We have also seen
that after 1808 it became illegal for British citizens to engage in
slave-trade. Whi~st, as we have noted, illicit traffic in slaves contin-
ued till about 1850, law-abiding British citizens turned their atten-
tion, from 1808, to legitimate articles of trade. So that at the time
that Mungo Park, Clapperton, and the Landers were busy unravelling
the mystery of the Niger in order to make the exploration and ex-
ploitation of the interior of the country possible, legitimate trade
between Nigeria and Britain along our coast was steadily increas-
ing. The ports ofWarri, Lagos, Benin River, Old and New Calabar,
Brass, and Bonny had become scenes of increasing activity and Brit-
ish steamships brought in assortments of manufactured goods, and
carried away increasing varieties of primary commodities.
In the absence, however, of a body like the Royal Niger Com-
pany, exclusively charged with the responsibility for law and or-
der, trading activities on the Bights of Benin and Biafra became
somewhat chaotic. The members of each trading expedition were
more or less a law unto themselves. To be sure, the Bights were
frequently visited by British naval ships. But these visits had noth-
ing to do with the supervision or regulation of trading activities.
They were made mainly in connection with Britain's intensive cam-
paign against the slave trade; and partly designed to provide pro-
tection for British citizens against threats to, and physical assaults
on, their lives and property.
As time went on, however, the British merchants themselves
felt the necessity for some form of supervision and regulation of
their activities along the coast. In due course l!'ey made represen-
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
of this treaty, a Vice-Consul was appointed for Lagos to assist
Beecroft.
In 1855, Akintoye died and was succeeded by his son, Dosumu,
a man of weak character who soon proved his incompetence for
the office. In the absence of any head possessed of sufficient abil-
ity to control the unruly elements which composed the society of
Lagos at the time, the greatest disorder prevailed: there was no
effective protection for property; there was no effective machin-
ery for enforcing the payment of debts; traders were maltreated
and plundered; and no redress of grievances could be obtained
without bribing the officers and retainers in Dosumu's court. Be-
sides, human sacrifices were committed even in sight of the town,
whilst clandestine traffic in slaves continued in its immediate
neighbourhood. As a result, the Treaty of 1852 became, to all in-
tents and purposes, a nullity, as Dosumu's control over his people
was little more than nominal.
Moved by the necessity of interposing some checks to these
evils, which were yearly becoming worse, and satisfied that the
permanent occupation of Lagos was indispensable to the total sup-
pression of the slave-trade in the Bight of Benin, Her Majesty's
Government took the view that the only way by which order and
effective administration could be maintained in Lagos was to
change its consular status to that of a British Colony.
Accordingly, in 1861, Lagos was ceded to Her Britannic Maj-
esty; and in 1862 H. S. Freeman was appointed the first British
Governor of Lagos. Thus Lagos became the first part of Nigeria to
come under British rule, and Mr. Freeman the first British official
to preside over a colonial regime on Nigerian soil. The Anglo-
Nigerian link was now becoming stronger.
Because of our climate, and the high mortality rate among the
early European visitors to our land, Nigeria, as well as other coun-
tries of West Africa for that matter, was regarded as unsuitable for
permanent white settlement. From 1808 to the early sixties of that
century, two things appear to have sustained the interests of the
British Government in Nigeria. They were: (1) the campaign for
the suppression of slave-trade; and (2) the need to give protection
to, and regulate the activities of, British merchants trading with
12
tati,ms to this effect to their Government; and in 1849 Lord
Palfllerston appointed John Beecroft as Consul for the Bights of
Ber'in and Biafra. By this appointment, Great Britain established
her first-ever diplomatic link with Nigeria.
J3efore his appointment as Consul, Beecroft was a British Resi-
dent in Fernando Po, which, with Spain's consent, had come un-
der British rule in 1827. But in 1844 Spain re-asserted its right by
again planting its flag on Fernando Po. As a result, Fernando Po
was restored to Spanish rule; and Beecroft, who was then the Brit-
ish Resident there, was appointed by the Spanish Government as
the Governor of the island. It was from his gubernatorial seat in
Fernando Po that he was expected to discharge the consular re-
sponsibility laid upon him by the British Government 'to regulate
the legal trade between the ports of Benin, Brass, New and Old
Calabar, Bonny, Bimbia, and the Cameroons' .
[n 1845 Kosoko, grandson ofOlogun Kutere, had deposed King
Akintoye and usurped the throne of Lagos, after a very savage and
bloody civil war. Akintoye fled to Abeokuta, from where he went
to 13adagry. After his ascension to the throne, Kosoko boosted, in
his domain, the slave-trade, which had already suffered a severe
setback as a result of Britain's anti-slave-trade naval operations.
He was also openly hostile and unfriendly to the British.
Just as the British were getting thoroughly fed up with Kosoko's
uncompromising encouragement of. the slave-trade, Akintoye ad-
dressed a beautifully worded petition to Beecroft in 1851 in which,
among other things, he prayed the British Government to restore
hini to his throne, and also promised 'to abolish the slave-trade at
Lagos, and to establish and carryon lawful trade, especially with
the English merchants.' Akintoye's prayer was strongly backed by
the Egbas.
In view of all this, and of the intransigence ofKosoko, Beecroft
visted Lagos in 1851 with a 'naval force of four hundred men.'
H~ drove King Kosoko from Lagos and restored the exiled
A'intoye as the King of Lagos. On 1 January 1852, the latter signed
a treaty in which he undertook to abolish the slave-trade in his
tel'l'itories, and to afford protection to 'Missionaries or Ministers
of the Gospel, of whatever nation or country.' After the execution
HOW THEY CAME
13
14
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
HOW THEY CAME
15
West African countries. Even these self-imposed assignments were
almost abdicated by Britain in 1865. On 26 June of that year, the
House of Commons adopted the recommendation ofa Committee
to the following effect:
That all further extension of territory or assumption of government, or new treaties
offering any protection to native tribes, would be inexpedient, and that the object
of our policy should be to encourage in the natives the exercise of those qualities
which may render it possible for us more and more to transfer to them the
administration of all the governments, with a view to our ultimate withdrawal
from all, except, probably, Sierra Leone.
But whilst Britain was contemplating 'ultimate withdrawal' from
West Africa, France was frantically busy trying to extend the
spheres of her influence there. The Germans too were beginning
to think that they also had a rendezvous with imperial destiny in
West Africa. Furthermore, by 1880, the scramble for Africa had
begun in real earnest. Britain lost no time in steeling her wavering
will. In 1884, the rival European powers assembled at a confer-
ence in Berlin under the chairmanship of Otto von Bismarck. At
that conference, the imperial powers reached a settlement about
the final demarcation of their respective spheres of influence in
Africa.
It would appear, however, that the settlement was an uneasy
one. For, in spite of it, the French, the British, and the Germans
continued to intrigue against one another for an extension of their
spheres of influence. In particular, the Germans felt that their great
leader von Bismarck had not pressed their claim sufficiently at the
Berlin Conference. As a result, there were treaty-making offensives
all over the place. Different methods were employed to induce or
coerce our people to agree to place themselves and their territories
under British protection. Bribery, cajolery, intimidation, military
aggression - any of these was used as occasion demanded, and
without the slightest compunction.
As time went on, it became clear to the British Government
that the Royal Niger Company was unequal to the mounting de-
mands of the imperial rivalry in which the British and the French,
in particular. had locked horns. To start with, the effective influ-
ence of the Company, as we have noted, had never extended very
much beyond the banks of the Niger, Benue, and the rivers in the
immediate vicinity of their trading stations. Besides, as a trading
concern with naturally very limited resources, and whose primary
object, in any case, was to make the maximum possible profit, the
Company was very ill-equipped, and could not, in the circum-
stances, be expected to provide the financial, administrative, dip-
lomatic, and military wherewithal which the new Anglo-French
imperialist competition warranted. Furthermore, the other firms
trading along the banks of the Niger had made complaints of rno-
nopolistic practices, in breach of its Charter, against the Company.
Because of all this, the Company's Charter was revoked with ef-
fect from I January 1900, when the British Government assumed
control of all the territories formerly placed under the jurisdiction
of the Company.
Under the instrument of revocation, compensation was paid to
the Royal Niger Company as follows:
(1) £450,000 for expenses incurred in connection with ad-
ministration.
(2) £115,000 for buildings and stores taken over for military
and administrative purposes; and
(3) £250,000 public debt.
In addition, the British Government undertook to impose royal-
ties on minerals won in the area lying between and north of the
Niger and Benue, with the exception of Bornu Province, and to
pay to the Company for a period of 99 years from the revocation
of its Charter, half of the receipts of such royalties. In 1949 the
sum of £2i/zmillion. was paid by the Nigerian Government to the
United Africa Company Limited - successor of the Royal Nige-
ria Company - as full compensation for the surrender by it of its
right to a moiety of royalties for the unexpired period of 50 years.
By I January 1900, the colonization of Nigeria had been almost
fully accomplished. The country was, at that date, administered
by Britain, either directly or indirectly, in three separate units:
(I) The Colony and Protectorate of Lagos which consisted of
the areas of authority of the present Western State and
Lagos State Governments, excluding Egba Division.
(2) The Protectorate of Southern Nigeria which comprised
roughly the areas of authority of the present three Eastern
States, and of the Midwestern State Government.
(3) The Protectorate of Northern Nigeria which was more or
less the same as the present six Northern States.
There was also an indigenous sovereign state which constituted
a tiny enclave in this huge dependency. It was known as the Egba
United Government. It came into existence in 1893, and its area of
authority was coterminous with what is now known as the Egba
Division of Abeokuta Province.
In 1906 the Colony and Protectorate of Lagos and the Protec-
torate of Southern Nigeria were merged into one administrative
unit known as the Colony and Protectorate of Southern Nigeria.
On I January 1914, the latter and the Protectorate of Northern
Nigeria were amalgamated to form the Colony and Protectorate of
Nigeria. On 16 September 1914, under circumstances which could
not be regarded as altogether free from the taints of fraudulent
diplomatic manoeuvres and duress, the Alake of Abeokuta was
made to surrender the sovereignty of his tiny domain, and to place
it 'unreservedly under the Government of the Protectorate ofNi-
geria.' By this act, the colonization of the whole of Nigeria by
Britain was consummated.
"16
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
2
How They Ruled
1. From Lugard to Richards
W
E have seen that by 1 January 1900, four distinct
administrative units had emerged. They were: (1) The Colony
and Protectorate of Lagos under a Governor; (2) The Protectorate
of Southern Nigeria under a High Commissioner; (3) The
Protectorate of Northern Nigeria under a High Commissioner; and
(4) The Egba United Government under the Alake of Abeokuta
and his Chiefs. British officials in charge of the first three were
responsible to the Colonial Office. But this had not always been
the case.
Before 1900, British officials in Nigeria were responsible to
three different authorities. Those in the Niger Coast Protectorate,
later known as the Protectorate of Southern Nigeria, were
responsible to the Foreign Office; those in the Colony and
Protectorate of Lagos, to the Colonial Office; while those in charge
of the areas which later became the Protectorate of Northern Nigeria
were responsible to the Board of Directors of the Royal Niger
Company. This extra-ordinary administrative set-up was
streamlined in 1900, and fully rationalized in 1914 under the
Governor-Generalship of Lord (then Sir Frederick) Lugard.
An imperialist of a very deep dye, Lord Lugard was an
exceedingly able and resourceful administrator, and a brilliant
soldier. To him, more than to anyone else, belongs the credit and
discredit for setting Nigeria on a course which Nigerian nationalists
and patriots feel themselves obliged to pursue, albeit with mixed
feelings, till the present day. We shall have more to say on this
assertion in Chapter 4. For the time being, let us try to learn, among
other things, a little more about this man and his doings in Nigeria.
His first visit to Nigeria was in 1894. He was then a soldier with
the rank of Captain; and he had come here, on behalf of the Royal
Niger Company, to negotiate treaties with the Chiefs of Borgu. It
17
- tribuneonlineng Original article