Nigerian celebrity chef Hilda Baci has initiated legal proceedings against singer Seyi Vibez, compelling him to retract statements made about her on social media. The legal action comes after Vibez made controversial posts that Baci's legal team deemed defamatory.

On August 14, 2026, Seyi Vibez, whose real name is Afolabi Oluwaseyi Balogun, shared two posts that sparked outrage, including a message that insinuated Baci's success was linked to cosmetic enhancements. Following this, Baci's lawyers from the prominent law firm Olaniwun Ajayi LP swiftly intervened, sending a demand letter to Vibez on August 15.

The letter outlined accusations of defamation and violations under Nigeria's Cybercrimes Act, demanding that Vibez remove the posts within three days. In addition to the takedown, Baci's legal team requested a public apology, a retraction across all of Vibez's social media platforms, and a plea to his followers to cease any harassment directed at her.

Baci's legal representatives emphasized the seriousness of the matter, warning that failure to comply with their demands could lead to further legal action. This move has garnered significant attention online, with many netizens expressing their support for Baci and criticizing Vibez's comments.

Social media reactions have been largely in favor of the chef, with users highlighting her hard work and dedication in the culinary industry. Comments from followers on Instagram reflect a collective sentiment that Vibez's remarks were unjust and undermined Baci's achievements.

This incident marks a notable moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding public figures and the impact of social media statements. As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how Vibez will respond to the legal demands and whether he will issue the requested apology.

Hilda Baci, known for her record-breaking culinary feats, has become a prominent figure in Nigeria's food scene, and this legal action underscores her commitment to defending her reputation against unfounded claims. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future.