The political tension between the camps of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and current Vice President Kashim Shettima has escalated, centering on the educational credentials of President Bola Tinubu. Atiku's team has raised a critical question regarding Tinubu's graduation, specifically how he could have graduated from a school that was not yet established at the time of his alleged graduation.

This exchange follows Shettima's recent remarks criticizing Atiku's proposal to reinstate the petrol subsidy. Shettima suggested that Atiku, who he claimed studied hygiene, lacks the understanding necessary to manage Nigeria's economy, citing his inability to differentiate between Ebola and flu. He argued that Atiku's subsidy proposal would lead the country back into poverty.

In a statement issued by Atiku's senior media aide, Phrank Shuaibu, the former Vice President's camp challenged Shettima to clarify the circumstances surrounding Tinubu's educational background instead of defending him. They emphasized that Shettima's attempts to shield Tinubu from scrutiny do not alter the facts regarding his academic history.

Atiku's camp criticized Shettima for focusing on educational records while neglecting pressing issues affecting Nigerians, such as the rising cost of living. They pointed out that many families are struggling to afford basic necessities, with some skipping meals and workers unable to cover their daily commuting costs. They urged Shettima to address these critical issues rather than engage in debates about school records.

The statement from Atiku’s camp has sparked a lively debate on social media, with many Nigerians weighing in on the question, "How did Tinubu graduate before the school he attended was established?" This inquiry reflects broader concerns about transparency and accountability in the current administration.

As the political discourse continues, it remains to be seen how this exchange will impact public perception of both Tinubu's presidency and Atiku's political aspirations. The ongoing dialogue highlights the significance of educational qualifications in the political arena and the expectations of voters regarding the integrity of their leaders.